With the 'opportunity, as a result of "differences" position within the group emerged from me "assist" in any order to resolve the dispute (which could involve all the parties that is not possible, by the will health of the company, a conciliar definition part), which was recorded by THIS WAIVER TO MY OFFICE PROFESSIONAL conferred upon me, SO AS TO ALLOW THROUGH THE NEW SINGLE DEFENDANTS, ANY individual transactions. For the record: RESOLUTION NUMBER "466 of December 21, 1999" THE ASL 8 DI CAGLIARI made a partial transaction, because an owner had submitted an application independent of agreement (accepted by ASL 8!)
THE FACE !!!DELCODE OF ETHIC!!!ACCORDING TO FORGET ABOUT YOU ' ADVOCATE Cagliari PAST TO THE OTHER PARTY ?
We arrive in mid-March, I go of the Order lawyers of Cagliari, to exposthe situation in our office, we unclear. Having so many requests, I setan appointment for Monday 'next. Spend the week, arrived in court ten o'clock, and are received by the President to 12:30. President heard my version of events exposes me that the processmust follow in order to initiate proceedings against our Advocate.
Just a document that sets forth in writing the reasons, which is signed by all its assisted, "citing the relevant article of the Code of Ethics."
Back home, my wife tells me that he called the secretary Advocate Joseph Macciotta, warning that a meeting had been convened "ASAP" at 17 and 30 in his study.I immediately thought that he had been warned, it was easy to understand who he was.
I was undecided whether to go to the meeting (not fear) but because I already knew how it was going, and what would our office.
"I was not mistaken MEETING ON"
The meeting was attended by all, the lawyer explains why this meeting so 'urgent, targeting all the owner said that he felt offended, because in the morning someone had gone to the order of lawyers, for information on how to make a statement in him, (he knows it was me, but I did not say) in the room all talk to each other to see who it was.I raise my hand and say: "I went." Only three have supported me in my decision, all the other hand, the lawyer did not dare to face, because (he knew he was right). The lawyer closed by saying that if it was done against the complaint, he would have resigned.
I finish my remarks by saying that the lawyer was wrong "MARKER" as Law and as a man. Others that I have supported not say anything to not waste my breath.
We arrive in mid January 2005, only four "twenty-five" owners sign the form (White) settlement proposed by ASL 8 in February, the lawyer shall meeting to make owners aware that ASL 8 did not agree on a definition conciliatory part.
(Do not understand why in 1999, ASL 8 define 'A transaction PARTIAL, since a INDIVISIBLE ABOUT LAND OWNER OF HIS A QUESTION OF AUTONOMOUS share)
The lawyer said that there was the possibility of a ruling in favor of ASL 8 to acknowledge "LIMITATION OF THE RIGHT TO DAMAGES"
Imagine the reaction of the owners "against me" who had not yet realized thatour lawyer from them 'little would give us a nice "kick in the pants"
(OVER THE MEETING SAID: ADVOCATE SHORT PASSERA 'TO ASL8)
The hearing of 7 has been postponed until May 26, 2005, (the new judge must study the issue) "Having been appointed in late September 2004"
Beginning in December 2004, the lawyer Joseph Macciotta convene a meeting.
(IF I HAD ONE OF DOUBT NOW WERE CERTAINTY)
"In the room immediately feel a strange atmosphere.“ Comes the lawyer said he had the good news, exposes the owners that encounter was with the Director-General ASL 8 Cagliari Dr. Efisio Auction, it was concluded with a positive result.La ASL The ASL was prepared to define the dispute and that such compensation was regarded as a ( misery ) "many did not understand," comes a lively discussion all went against me and another owner like me had realized it was another joke. After the meeting, the lawyer took the forms (blank) data from ASL 8, who accepted ( misery ) would sign the document before Christmas.
(ALL 'LAWYER said: This is' a joke, I showed Transactions made in 1999, THE COPIES FOR HIM, NOT THE PRES)
Lawyer Joseph Macciotta convene a meeting, stating that the hearing June had been postponed to October 7, 2004 because the Court had failed to appoint the new judge. The lawyer puts its customers aware that ASL 8 Cagliari have made a proposal to define economic litigation.
Some owner was happy, I said " HERE' change the air ADVOCATE WANTS TO LEAVE, THE ASL 8 Cagliari WANT TO Teasing as it did in 1991 "
Beginning in December 2003) Our lawyer Joseph Macciotta convenes his clients for a meeting in his office. In addition updating the situation the owners announced that the judge was replaced. He said that the new judge would set a new hearing date not earlier than six to eight months, said there had been in contact with the new General Manager of ASL 8 Dr. Efisio Aste to reach a settlement agreement between the parties.
Hearing on April 9, 2003 regularly take place on May 8, 2003 for final discussion tells us our lawyer Joseph Macciotta. Also on May 8, 2003 umpteenth reference to October 21, 2003. On October 21, 2003 the Judge shall summon the parties for a settlement, as happened before the other party fails to appear at the hearing.
