lunedì 5 ottobre 2015

Notification of the Judgment









Before Christmas (that timing) is notified of the decision at first instance.

AR retreat Advocate Gavino Satta the 18/12/2006, now there are thirty days (we are in the holidays) of time, for use on appeal, contact all other owners, offering to appeal all, delegating only one legal, organize a meeting at the office of my lawyer, before all agree, then jumps around.

All are undecided whether to continue, I am told that for clarification, go to another lawyer (area via Sonnino), the legal advise them (rare instance in Italy) to let go, because they go against the policy, and the powers that be, is a losing battle, despite my insistence, they abandon.
 
Against the judgment of first instance, appeals only my mother, along with my aunt, the 12/1/2007 the appeal is filed with the Court of Appeal of Cagliari, at the office of the Advocate Francesco Frongia, and knowledge for all 'Department of Health of the Autonomous Region of Sardinia Dr. Nerina Dirindin.

domenica 24 agosto 2014

Judgment (ridiculous) of First Instance.







All documents filed in before the first-instance judgment, have been seen? read? assessed?
By the Judge? (Dr. Maria Teresa Spanu)




lunedì 24 febbraio 2014

Between hearing and the other ...








Hearing of 7/7/2005: Creation of a new defender.

Hearing on 20/10/2005: Clarification of the Opinion.

Hearing on 6/13/2006: The Judge holds decision in the case, with time, to claim and objections.




Between hearing and the other in April 2006, I am in possession of documents (to win the case) very important.

I go Advocate Gavino Satta.

I - Mr. Satta, are to be deposited in the file.

Lawyer - I can not.

I - why?

Lawyer - the final statements have been filed by the lawyer. Joseph Macciotta, other documents, are accepted only at the discretion of the Judge.

I - You can not do anything?, Try to put them before the judgment, now just missing.

Lawyer - I can not, the Judge, definitely rejects the request.

I - Try it costs nothing.

Lawyer - Do not insist, I repeat, it is useless.

I - I see, I'll go.

NB (From client, I become Attorney)




May 2006: I go to court.

Arrival around 11:30, I search the Judge Dr. Maria Teresa Spanu, I can trace
by another judge, he tells me it has to wait, it is at the hearing.


Around 13:00 (Stationery ground floor) we meet, I explain the importance of the documents, the judge takes vision, I wondered: is she one of the parties?

I - No, my mother.

He thinks for a while, then I said, okay, I need a self motivated her in stamp duty.

I - okay, I'm going to the bar Matta, purchase the stamp, I go back to court.

Judge, wait in the hallway, next to the Court, speaking on the phone,
as soon as he sees me, greets the caller, hang up the call, approaches, and says to me: I'm sorry, I can not insert new documents in the file.

I - How? Dr. makes me buy the stamp, before he says yes, then changes his mind.

G. - I'm sorry.

I - Good day, Judge.

G - Good day to you too.




NB After four years, I find that those documents were already in the file.

All documents filed in before the first-instance judgment, have been seen? read? assessed?

giovedì 29 agosto 2013

Were we to... (AAA .... Lawyer Wanted !!!)

                               (Updates from September)



AAA .... Lawyer Wanted !!!


In early June of the 2005 i received a phone call.
It was one of the owners, which I proposed to give the job the attorney Roberto Pala (recommended by whom he had just left !!!)
He said, "all the others agree, the only one missing you" I answered with a resounding "NO!"

Thus began the search for a new lawyer. After several phone calls all the lawyers contacted, refused the post "as soon as I explained what it was."

Surfing the net, I found a comment from a lawyer to a ruling by the European Court.

http://www.diritto.it/articoli/europa/sechi.html

Contact the lawyer, but like its predecessors, just explain the problem refuses the job.

A week before the hearing the lawyer Gavino Satta accepts the assignment.

lunedì 12 novembre 2012

Interview Municipality of Cagliari and Hospital Brotzu.

                      Why keep this secret? for almost a month?                                
 


martedì 6 novembre 2012

Car parking Hospital Brotzu Cagliari.




  August 7, 2012 The parking of Brotzu return free.






The works (ABUSIVE!) Brotzu in the territory of Cagliari TODAY (have not been dismantled.) ... A SHAME!      (Time expired!)

                                              
                                  (Ordinance Demolition)           
                                                


mercoledì 22 agosto 2012

Car parking Hospital Brotzu Cagliari.

The March 15, 2012 were inaugurated the new parking payment, (despite the action for annulment of the building permit issued by the City of Selargius) concession with a cadastral (Protocol N ° 11091, part of the concession) attached to question by the Hospital Brotzu with "48 owners" (EACH FOR YOUR RIGHTS) and self-certification of the DG Brotzu. (For the City of Selargius everything is fine.)