We arrive in mid-March, I go of the Order lawyers of Cagliari, to exposthe situation in our office, we unclear.
Having so many requests, I set an appointment for Monday 'next.
Spend the week, arrived in court ten o'clock, and are received by the President to 12:30. President heard my version of events exposes me that the process must follow in order to initiate proceedings against our Advocate.
Just a document that sets forth in writing the reasons, which is signed by all its
assisted, "citing the relevant article of the Code of Ethics."
Back home, my wife tells me that he called the secretary Advocate
Joseph Macciotta, warning that a meeting had been convened "ASAP" at 17 and 30 in his study. I immediately thought that he had been warned, it was easy to understand who he was.
I was undecided whether to go to the meeting (not fear) but because I already knew
how it was going, and what would our office.
"I was not mistaken MEETING ON"
The meeting was attended by all, the lawyer explains why this meeting so 'urgent, targeting all the owner said that he felt offended, because in the morning
someone had gone to the order of lawyers, for information on how to make a statement in
him, (he knows it was me, but I did not say) in the room all talk to each other to see who it was.I raise my hand and say: "I went."
Only three have supported me in my decision, all the other hand, the lawyer did not dare
to face, because (he knew he was right).
The lawyer closed by saying that if it was done against the complaint, he would have resigned.
I finish my remarks by saying that the lawyer was wrong "MARKER" as Law and as a man.
Others that I have supported not say anything to not waste my breath.
