Judgment Supreme Court of Cassation (Pontius Pilate model)

<1.1. - With the first ground of appeal, the appellant alleges omitted and/or insufficient

and/or contradictory reasoning on the crucial point of the dispute, namely

the disputed transfer of ownership and the registration in favor of the public

body of the occupied land. The Court of Appeal did not evaluate the cadastral

record submitted on appeal, which showed the appellants as owners of the

land as of May 29, 2006. Given this document, which should not be considered

late, the Court of Appeal should have explained why it considered the property

already registered in favor of the public body. At the very least, it should have indicated

from what date, after May 2006.>